Battle of the Marbles |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Kazuhiro
Forum Admin Group Joined: 15 Jan 2011 Location: Tokyo, Japan Status: Offline Points: 3774 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 23 Sep 2012 at 7:45pm |
I can enjoy each atmosphere as recording at that time enough. The Santana version is still powerful. I like the McLaughlin version, but like performances such as Lifetime personally. I went to Santana.
|
|
dreadpirateroberts
Forum Admin Group Joined: 06 Jul 2011 Location: AU Status: Offline Points: 1836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Evening it up with a vote for Carlos - enjoying all the keyboard too - I think Slava's right too about John's being subtler.
|
|
We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
Reviews... |
|
snobb
Forum Admin Group Site Admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Vilnius Status: Offline Points: 29527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Santana/Buddy Miles Band version is heavy on keyboards and full of raw energy, smells like Woodstock '68 for me. McLaughlin version is more complex, not so emotional, even a bit calculated, my vote goes to John.
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35157 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"Marbles" was a classic early jazz-rock song, with a repeating riff that was a cross between an Indian tamboura and Memphis RnB, it created a great groove for 70s style cosmic solos.
You can hear both versions on our front page videos for the next few days. If it is later in the week and the expiration date has expired, just go to the home pages of John McLaughlin and the Santana band to hear these songs.
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |