The Jazz Chrysalis |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 09 Jul 2011 at 10:04pm |
How did, or how do you think, Jazz developed. Not talking first or most important artists or records, but the conditions and process under which musicians starting playing what became 'jazz'. Was it inevitable? Did social or economic factors play a role or simply musical ones? Was improvisation a rebellious breaking away from traditional music or a quiet movement toward deeper self-expression; and was improv, as is most often professed, the deciding factor or was some other motivation involved?
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Basically it grew out of marching bands in New Orleans who would accompany funerals, marches etc. The marches were so long and the tunes so repititious that the horn players would start to improvise, to relieve boreedom and probably just came natural after a while.
Later when jazz musicians moved north, they didn't march but sat and played, the rest is history. All the same, improv was in music way before jazz.
|
|
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Interesting, I didn't know about marching band connection. Well I guess that answers my question .. thank you John for ending this thread with one fell swoop of your musicalogical prowess .. goodnight folks !
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sorry ...but its in all the jazz history books.
|
|
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
fair enough-- but how about some independent speculation, I mean there must be a little more to it .. make something up if you have to (you know, improvise )
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Probably the most interesting speculation and discussion/arguments in jazz comes from how different genres develope, for instance take jazz rock or fusion.
Did somebody invent it, no way. On the jazz side you have Larry Coryell, Tony Williams, Miles etc On the rock side you have Cream and Hendrix In Britian you have people in between like McLaughlin, Soft Machine Brian Auger etc I'm sure there are people who will argue about who was the first jazz rocker, or the first be-bopper etc and I am sure soeone would point out who is missing from the above mentioned names.
Edited by js - 09 Jul 2011 at 10:44pm |
|
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well I certainly agree improvisation has always been a big part of all music, but that being the case, then what would distinguish the development of jazz as jazz (other than an American art form) ?
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It comes back to the marching horn bands in New Orleans at the turn of the century. they were playing rags and military marches and improvising on them in a sort of swing style.
When those musicians moved north what we now call dixieland developed, basically similar to original new orleans jazz but now they are seated so you could include a drum set and a piano player and replace the tuba with a string bass. From there you get jazz. I'm sure other types of improvisation came in as things rolled along, gypsy music for instance or later Indian music. Edited by js - 09 Jul 2011 at 11:07pm |
|
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
and let's not forget smack
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Smack? ..oh yeah, smack. Thats probably how you got bop, cool, hard bop, post bop, avant-garde and lots of fusion too, basically a lot of modern jazz. Possibly part of the nu jazz scene too, I don't know.
|
|
idlero
Forum Senior Member VIP member Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 2158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One of the explanations for improvisation I've heard is that many musicians didn't know to read notes so that they were improvising
|
|
I think the problem with a lot of the fusion music is that it's extremely predictable, it's a rock rhythm and the solos all play the same stuff and they play it over and over again ...
Ken Burns |
|
Sean Trane
Forum Senior Member Joined: 19 Apr 2011 Location: Brussels Status: Offline Points: 789 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
QUOTE=Atavachron]Well I certainly agree improvisation has always been a big part of all music, but that being the case, then what would distinguish the development of jazz as jazz (other than an American art form) ?
[/QUOTE] sorry to barge in in your conversation, but generally improvisation is not part of classical music (not conting the contemporary and
Not sure I'm right about this, but outside Indian music, I don't think improvisation was common in music at all... It seems that this was a X Xth C thing
Don't think getting smashed out of your skull was reserved to jazz (and later to rock)
I understand that Chopin and the Russian composers were not exactly sober and straight (and Mozart was getting stoned on O2 + N2)
the Impressionist painters used to soar on all types of sustances, most notably on absynth
|
|
my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicted musicians to crazy ones....
|
|
Atavachron
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 26 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 189 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
barge in all you want Hugues, that's what the thread's here for, the more the merrier .. and yes musicians have been getting bombed for centuries god bless 'em
|
|
Matt
Forum Admin Group Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2525 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
New Orleans was a real pot pourri with plenty of influences , Not only did we have Afro American with the blues influence but French with Cajun, in those times it was more formal and real French and even Cuba had influence but in the 19th century the music was very formal and geared towards Classical if anything. You also had our stuff as well with the old popular songs and folk and the lot got mixed gradually to become Jazz. Anyway thats my theory with no book or net, just me came up with that.
I would have loved to have the wagons the bands that they all piled on to and go around town playing. They do it on trucks now, well Kermit Ruffins still does. Would have also loveed to have seen the old Dancehalls or bars where they played. I can tell you one thing, they did not sit around politely clapping like today which I find pretentious personally, if people start jumping around and yellin' for the band watch the band play better and the night will be great fun. Isn't that was Jazz is all about or music for that matter. Buddy Bolden was the man they all said that his trumpet rang around New Orleans, bloody sad by the time they recorded him he had lost his teeth Not much chop for a trumpet....no teeth
Edited by Matt - 10 Jul 2011 at 6:56pm |
|
Matt
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yep, jazz was not recorded until 1927, after it had already been around for 30 to 40 years. The earliest recordings were not by the innovators but copycats. It took awhile before they got the real jazzmen in the studio.
|
|
Kazuhiro
Forum Admin Group Joined: 15 Jan 2011 Location: Tokyo, Japan Status: Offline Points: 3774 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When I had received the lesson of the drum before, the teacher said to me. It was said that the drum and fife band that performed the march to pull military forces was at the head. Is it correct though it was said it was very dangerous because the drum and fife band doesn't have arms? It is that people actually listen live and it danced when the band that plays jazz holds the party at home or that I memorized it. It is a part of not the hall but familiar music. It was memorized I to was in the process of the development of jazz. |
|
Matt
Forum Admin Group Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2525 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
Matt
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Jazz is best in a small club and no amps, especially avant-garde and/or larger ensembles.
I guess you've heard Buddy Rich's famous diatribes against his players who would move to close to the mic, ouch.
|
|
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Speaking of audience participation, my friend had this live Parker record from way back and they all must be loaded and are playing everything at break neck speed and people are yelling with the music. Very insane atmosphere, like a really good party.
|
|
Matt
Forum Admin Group Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2525 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Lighting Techs gear pre 1900
|
|
Matt
|
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |