Multiple recipients for private messages?
Printed From: JazzMusicArchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.JazzMusicArchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1426
Printed Date: 04 Dec 2024 at 12:16pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.16 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Multiple recipients for private messages?
Posted By: dreadpirateroberts
Subject: Multiple recipients for private messages?
Date Posted: 12 Jan 2012 at 8:21pm
|
Just another non-urgent question, though this one is (maybe) of more use to Admin & Collabs etc, but if you could send a single PM to multiple members it'd be handy. Again, no rush, I can most certainly copy & paste in the meantime
------------- We are men of action. Lies do not become us. http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/dreadpirateroberts%28member%29.aspx?reviews=all/" rel="nofollow - Reviews... |
Replies:
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: 13 Jan 2012 at 3:40am
|
Yeah, it's a cool feature if used wisely
I could've used that feature on ProgArchives on many occasions... but knowing the site's history of crisis; it's probably better that it didn't exist... coz this feature could easily be used to form cliques and gang up on someone for ex..
Most likely the JMA crowd (and jazz fans in general) is a more adult one, so it could indeed be a plus for the site
------------- my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicted musicians to crazy ones.... 
|
Posted By: UMUR
Date Posted: 13 Jan 2012 at 5:49am
I´m more worried about spamming!
|
Posted By: dreadpirateroberts
Date Posted: 13 Jan 2012 at 6:00am
From bots or fellow members? 
Perhaps it's an idea fraught with peril - though I do agree, the current membership of JMA is certainly a generally responsible one ------------- We are men of action. Lies do not become us. http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/dreadpirateroberts%28member%29.aspx?reviews=all/" rel="nofollow - Reviews... |
UMUR wrote: