Chord Progression Suggestions |
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Author | ||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 28 Jul 2011 at 9:11am |
|
For the following chord progression I'd like some suggestions in terms of substitutions, extensions and alterations.
The original is I - V - viim - IV So in C that would be C - G - Am - F I've come up with E7/C - Fm7/G - F#dim - Bm/F Suggestions?
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Am would be vi not vii
Some of your chords may not be spelled right, you have an F at the root of a b,d, f # triad, maybe that was on purpose. If you want to modernize your C G am F sequence, and still have it function the way the original does, try this. em7/C am7/G em7/A am7/F
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Now in a modern blues style.
em7b5/C dm7 bm7b5/G am7 cm6 F7
Edited by js - 28 Jul 2011 at 9:55am |
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In terms of the spelling I was going for Cmaj7#5 - G11b9 - F#dim - Fmaj13b9#11. Hope that's better. But thanks for the suggestions!
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I see, I went back to your original, it sounds good with some really extended harmonies, but I don't get the diminished chord it seems out of place. Do you mean a fully diminished 7 chord ie f# a c d#
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
By the way, I bet you could write some good album reviews.
|
||
Jazz Pianist
Forum Senior Member Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Location: Birmingham, UK Status: Offline Points: 118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You mean vi (or vim)? None of this really works man, I can tell by looking at it (with the greatest of respect to you) - First chord is along the right lines of tertiary substitution (substitution by thirds), however there is one note that clouds its identity as a diatonically functioning chord, and that's the B natural, the 5th of E7. Because C is the route of your chord, for it to sound nice you need to treat it like a C7 chord, using notes from E7 to spice it up. As mentioned above, the only issue is the B natural, and to make the chord function as a nice dominant, just flatten it. Your new chord would be E7(b5)/C, or otherwise known as a C9(#5). -The next chord would work fine for an unresolved effect, however personally I'd keep the F in the bass and make it a minor 9, just a suggestion. - I don't really understand the context of this chord (f#dim) unless you are modulating to Gm, which you don't in the next chord. Maybe think this over a little bit more? Diminished chords have a very special place and mostly function as a hollow type dominant as a substitute for chord V, e.g. you're F# diminished would work nicely as a substitute for D7 in G minor, so long as it wasn't an final cadence. You can't really dot them around anywhere in diatonic harmony... - Unless you are purposely trying to create something that sounds horrific (horror movie composers use this bad boy all the time), then this chord has pretty much no function, because the parent chord and the root note are a tritone apart. Minor chords don't have a tritone relationship like dominant 7th chords do! Your initial chord sequence is ok, however it doesn't really serve itself to substitutions as it kind of ignores pythagoras's pendulum model. I'd suggest changing the order around so that the G is at the end of the sequence. As for effective substitutions in western harmony, I'll be posting an article of mine on them in the next few days, referring to all the most commonly used substitutions (including tritone and tertiary) plus some harmony basics, so I'll link you here. Also feel free to inbox me Edited by Jazz Pianist - 28 Jul 2011 at 10:58am |
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
sorry guys now I've seen it I meant vim (typo error)
|
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes that's what I meant.
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Fully diminished chords aren't usually used in modern jazz (since about the early 40s) they sound pretty square compared to the other more complex chords you are using there.
Like jazz pianist said, they were great for in house organ players when accompanying old horror movies Try looking into half-diminished chords ie f# a c e etc, which will supply a much more modern sound that would jive better with your modern extended chords.
Edited by js - 28 Jul 2011 at 12:15pm |
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In most modern (post 40s) jazz, a fully diminished chord is like a substitute for a dominant 7th and would probably be spelled out like a 7th with a flat 9, but just a plain fully diminished seventh chord without any extra tones is going to sound dated.
Edited by js - 28 Jul 2011 at 12:21pm |
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So for a I - V - vim - IV chord progression what would you play?
|
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
OK cool! As the saying goes "You gotta learn something every day."
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As it's a band situation and I'm more of a hired gun not the band leader, I'm not in a position to make changes to the progression. It's what I've got to work with. Blame it on U2 "With or Without You". That's why I really want to toy around with it.
|
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Don't have the jazz maturity for that yet.
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If you're just trying to dress up some U2 changes, try that first variation I dropped off, it will put the song into modern pop-jazz territory similar to EW&F and Steely Dan. You'll still be able to hear the initial progression too, just more modern and 'jazzy'.
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Here's another Steely Dan type variation on your original:
Bb Maj/C FMaj/G em7/A am7/F
|
||
chuckyspell
Forum Groupie Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks so far!
What are some other suggestions if I wanted to go for the jugular in an avant garde or bop way?
|
||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
This one is dissonant, but still in your original functional harmony:
C in the bass with E Bb Eb voiced in the right hand G in the bass, slide that right hand up a half step to F B E A in the bass with G C# F# in the right hand F in the bass, slide the previous notes up a half step to G# D G You have to voice it the above way to sound cool, but what you have is: C7 #9 G13 A13 Fm13
Edited by js - 28 Jul 2011 at 11:51pm |
||
Post Reply | Page 123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |